An online survey released on the new Radeon RX 7800 and RX 7700 XT card. This article will examine the main points of the older model Radeon RX 7800 XT. Let’s assume that the new product isn’t as fast as the previous generation models Radeon RX 6800 and cost $150. A new AMD card proved to be more productive and cheaper than the new GeForce GTX 4070, but was lost in ray tracing often.

Image Source: Toms Hardware.

Let’s remember that the Radeon RX 7800 XT is powered by the Navi 32 xT graphics chip with 60 execution units (3840 stream processors). The gaming frequency of the Radeon RX 7800 xT GPU is stated at 2124 MHz, and the Boost frequency is 2430 MHz. The Radeon RX 7800 XT was able to drive 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a speed of 19,5 Gbit/s per contact, support for a 256-bit bus, and a maximum bandwidth of 2708 GB/s including 64 MB of Infinity Cache memory. The power consumption of the accelerator is stated at 263. This article presents information from the review of TechPowerUp and Toms Hardware, which included the reference version of the Radeon RX 7800 XT.

Source image: TechPowerUp.

The target number for the Zynth X 7800 xT is 1440. According to 25 gaming tests conducted by the TechPowerUp portal, in games with raster graphics (without rays), the Radeon RX 7800 XT video card was 4% faster than the GeForce RTX 4070.

TechPowerUp is a source of image.

The portal says that in some cases, RX 7800 XT surpassed its competitor by 18%. One of the examples is the game “Cyberpunk 2077”. In both cases, the performance of the AMD card was 8% lower than the RTX 4070 model as a reference to Deathloop.

Radeon RX 7800 xT raster graphics performance at 1440p resolution. Image Source: Toms Hardware

The new Radeon card, a version of the GeForce RTX 3080, was the most popular model of the original generation. As for the earlier generation, the new Radeon x-axis has only 3% more potential than the old Radeon x-axis.

The Portal Toms Hardware gives same value. In their tests, the Radeon RX 7800 XT was 7% faster than the RTX 4070 and a whopping 40% faster than the RTX 4060 Ti (8GB and 16GB). The result is for each game.

Even in games with ray tracing, AMD’s new product, as expected, seemed slower than its competitor, resulting in 15% less performance of the GeForce RTX 4070 in general, reports TechPowerUp. The Toms Hardware portal says that the Radeon RX 7800 XT lags behind the GeForce RTX 4070 in ray tracing lags at 27 %. The developer of the given game has been working so hard as to be successful.

Radeon RX 7800 XT performance in 1080p raster graphics. Source of the image: Toms Computer.

The Radeon X 7800 XT model is still faster than GeForce RTX 4070, according to the TechPowerUp portal. However, the performance difference is reduced to an average of two dollars. As a result, as Toms Hardware writes, the results of tests with raster graphics and ray tracing have shown that the GeForce RTX 4070 is 9% ahead of the new AMD product.

The gap between the Radeon RX 7800 XT and GeForce RX 4060 Ti under the same conditions is slashed from 40 percent to 28 percent. As well, performance differences between the Radeon RX 7800 and RX 6800 XT vary. In some tests, the new product was 2 % slower, in others 10 % faster.

Reflexors at 4K resolution: Radeon RX 7800 xT raster. Originator of image: Toms Hardware.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is 2.5 times faster than the GeForce RTX 4070 in raster graphics games, TechPowerUp reports. Toms Hardware, in turn, has noted that the GeForce RTX 4070 (raster graphics + ray tracing) was 5% higher in 4K resolution than the new product.

In terms of energy efficiency, the RX 7800 XT, which is a win-win for the Radeon RX, is inferior to its competitors. On the other hand, it consumes 50 W less than the previous generation RX 6800 XT. Even if AMD isn’t as efficient as NVIDIA, its new product is also less expensive. Toms Hardware estimates the cost of a virtual machine computer (SX) 7800 (maximum) power at the top of the game by 1080p was 235 W, and at 1440p and 4K at 250 W. The same machine with the VX 4070 consumes about 172194 W, was written by Toms Hardware. TechPowerUp cites the maximum value of 201 W in games on the RTX 4070 card. The AMD card lags significantly off the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. The RTX 4060 Ti version with eight GB of memory consumes 167-147 W, and 16 GB of memory 146-157 W.

Driven by Radeon RX 7800 XT. Source: TechPowerUp.

The TechPowerUp portal cooled its graphics processor to 75 degrees Celsius, improving the performance of the Radeon RX 7800 XT video card. At the hottest point of the accelerator, the temperature remained 92 degrees Celsius. In games at 1440p and 4K resolution, Toms Hardware upgraded its card to 71 degrees on the GPU. At 1080 p resolution, the temperature of the card was 70 degrees. The fan benefited from manipulating the device’s settings to save it to 60 degrees.

The Radeon X 7800 xT, which is powered by a more efficient cooling system, will be available on the market.

Image source: TechPowerUp.

The TechPowerUp review notes that GeForce RTX 4070, at 600 dollars, is 22% slower in raster graphs, but 20% higher if compared to 500 RX 7800. Even so, the NVIDIA card is 16 % faster at ray tracing, has 4GB of video memory and consumes 50W less power. The key feature of the RTX 4070 is the DLSS-3 technology, particularly its frame generator. If it is worth the $100 overpayment, it is the decision of the buyer. Even the $40-a-piece GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB model is becoming more expensive compared to AMD video card. It’s up to 30 percent slower in raster pictures and 10 percent less precise in ray tracing.

Overall, reviewers concluded that the RX 7800 XT is a good choice for those who don’t want to overpay for ray tracing, but still want a graphics card for 1440p gaming. This system surpasses GeForce’s more expensive RTX 4070 when using regular (raster) graphics.

If you notice the error, select it with the mouse and press CTRL+ENTER.